Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 22878

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : VC06 - VC10 Full Version

Correlation of Global DNA Methylation with Symptom Severity in Drug-Naïve Bipolar Disorder Patients: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63866.18577
Deepak Kumar Rout, Mihir Ranjan Nayak, Roma Rattan, Snigdha Awasthi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Manipal Tata Medical College, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sundargarh, Odisha, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Manipal Tata Medical College, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Deepak Kumar Rout,
Q. No. 682, Baridh, East Singbhum, Jamshedpur-831017, Jharkhand, India.
E-mail: deepakrout6891@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar disorder has emerged as a significant health problem in India. Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) methylation studies could provide a significant clues toward the early identification of high-risk individuals.

Aim: To estimate the levels of global DNA methylation in drug-naïve bipolar disorder patients and healthy controls and to correlate the global DNA methylation levels with the severity of the disease.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Psychiatry at SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India, from January 2019 to March 2020. A total of 50 bipolar disorder patients and 50 age-matched healthy adult controls were recruited from the Outpatient Departments (OPD) of the hospital, and the severity of bipolar disorder was assessed using Young’s Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). DNA methylation levels were estimated from serum samples of the subjects using a methylated DNA quantification kit. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the DNA methylation scores, and the Pearson’s correlation test was used to correlate DNA methylation levels with disease severity. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 34.44±12.45 years. A total of 100 subjects were included in the study, with 50 being bipolar disorder patients and the remaining 50 in the control group. Bipolar cases, particularly depression, had higher levels of DNA methylation than controls (p=0.0001). On correlation analysis, patients with Bipolar Depression (BD) had a significant correlation with DNA methylation (p-value <0.001) compared to patients with mania and controls.

Conclusion: Bipolar patients, especially those with BD, exhibit higher levels of global DNA methylation in genes compared to healthy control groups. Global DNA methylation can serve as an important early disease marker for bipolar patients, aiding in prevention and early detection efforts.

Keywords

Depression, Deoxyribonucleic acid methylation assay, Epigenetics, Mania

Bipolar disorder is a disabling condition characterised by severe and pervasive mood episodes, presenting with hypomanic, manic, depressive, or mixed episodes (a simultaneous mixture or rapid alternation within a few hours of depressive and manic or hypomanic manifestation) (1). It has a multifactorial origin resulting from complex interactions between genetic susceptibility and environmental stimuli. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, can modulate gene expression in response to the environment and might account for part of the heritability reported for bipolar disorder (2).

Clinical symptomatology and phenomenology are still the basis for diagnosing bipolar disorder, depending on the doctor’s subjective judgments. However, the diagnosis of bipolar disorder is often delayed, under-diagnosed, or over-diagnosed, with an approximate time lapse between the initial consultation and the correct diagnosis often taking more than 10 years (1),(3). It is often confused with other diagnoses, such as psychotic and cluster B personality disorders (4),(5),(6). Additionally, it is commonly under-recognised in patients presenting with depression for the first time, creating a significant clinical problem (6). Failing to recognise bipolar disorder in depressed patients has significant treatment and clinical implications, including the under prescription of mood stabilising medications, an increased risk of rapid cycling, and increased care costs (7). Delay in diagnosis has also been observed to increase potential morbidity and mortality. To address this problem, different methodologies, such as molecular genetics, are now being utilised to identify at-risk populations. Recent genetic studies on affective disorders indicate that several chromosomal regions may be involved in the aetiology of bipolar affective disorder (8). Genes with an aberrant methylation pattern can represent novel candidate factors in the aetiology and pathology of neuropsychiatric disorders like bipolar disorder and schizophrenia (9).

Previous genetic studies have suggested that bipolar disorder strongly correlates with genetic aetiology, as seen in twin studies and population-based family risk studies, which showed a heritability rate of 58% [10,11]. Environmental exposure also has an effective contribution to the onset of the illness via epigenetics, which is the effect of the environment on the genes of susceptible individuals (3). Various epigenetic mechanisms have been implicated as a predisposing factors for the onset of bipolar disorder. These include DNA methylation, histone methylation and acetylation, and non coding Ribonucleic Acids (RNAs). Among these, DNA methylation was the most appropriate mechanism for research study as it is often the most stable form of epigenetic alteration (12),(13),(14).

The DNA methylation refers to the addition of a methyl group at the 5th carbon of cytosine residues 5-Methyl Cytosine (5mC) of CpG dinucleotides (cytosine proximal to guanine) (15). It plays essential roles in cell dynamics, including the regulation of gene expression and the maintenance of epigenetic memory. Increased methylation levels at promoter regions can lead to decreased gene expression (16). Epigenetic changes in bipolar disorder are supported by observations of altered methylation levels, such as 5mC, on promoter regions of specific candidate genes like Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) and Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) (17),(18),(19). Extensive investigations have been conducted on alterations in DNA methylation patterns in patients with bipolar disorder. These patterns serve as promising markers that can integrate both genotype and environmental effects (20). One approach to studying DNA methylation patterns is by examining global methylation patterns in peripheral tissues such as leukocytes.

Molecular genetics offers an alternative strategy for studying genetic factors involved in complex diseases, including psychiatric disorders, where the mode of inheritance is polygenic. Correlation studies in this field often compare frequencies of genetic marker alleles in patients and control populations to detect linkage disequilibrium. However, these correlations may also be spurious due to the input DNA, which can be influenced by variables such as the subject’s ethnicity, gender, obesity, smoking status, and others. While previous studies have mostly focused on global methylation patterns among patients already on mood stabilisers, there is a lack of research on global DNA methylation patterns among drug-naïve bipolar patients, particularly in the Indian population.

The present study, one of the first from India, aimed to examine DNA methylation levels among drug-naïve patients with bipolar disorder. By selecting drug-naïve patients as subjects, the study eliminates the risk of confounding due to psychotropic use. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to estimate the levels of global DNA methylation in drug-naïve bipolar disorder patients and healthy controls, compare DNA methylation between the two groups, and correlate DNA methylation with the severity of depression and mania.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Psychiatry in collaboration with the Department of Biochemistry at SCB Medical College and Hospital, Odisha, India, between January 2019 and March 2020. The study was undertaken after obtaining an Ethical clearance certificate from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC/IRB NO: 936/14.10.19) vide ref no-718/09-01-19 the equipment required for the present study was procured from the Multidisciplinary Research Units (MRU) fund. Each participant in both groups was informed about the usefulness and harmfulness of the study in their native language. The participants and their informant/s voluntarily gave written consent and were assured of the confidentiality of the data collected from them.

Sample size calculation: The sample calculation was done with a power of 80%, a confidence level of 95%, and after adjusting for estimated dropouts/non-consent (20%), the sample size was estimated to be around 71 age-matched pairs of cases and controls (21). However, at the end of the study, 50 bipolar disorder cases and 50 age-matched healthy controls were recruited from the OPD of Psychiatry.

Inclusion criteria: Patients of either sex between 18 to 65 years of age, who were drug-naïve (i.e., with no previous history of psychiatric treatment in their lifetime) and diagnosed with bipolar disorder as per ICD-10 DCR criteria (22), were consecutively included in the case group. In the control group, medically stable and age-matched subjects with no history of intellectual disability, organic disorder, comorbid medical conditions, and no family history of any mental disorders were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those with a history of substance abuse or drug dependence, psychosis, neurodevelopmental disorder, eating disorder, organic disorder, endocrine diseases, pregnant patients, terminal illnesses, and other psychiatric disorders other than bipolar disorder were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A semi-structured performa was used to obtain demographic profiles and relevant medical history. The severity of manic symptoms in bipolar disorder was assessed using YMRS (23), and the HAM-D was used to rate depressive symptoms (24). The methylated DNA quantification Kit (colorimetric) was used to analyse DNA methylation quantitatively. This kit is suitable for detecting global DNA methylation status using DNA isolated from 2 mL of blood collected from all study subjects in Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) vials. It is optimised for quantifying methylated and hydroxymethylated DNA or quantifying methylated DNA alone (25),(26),(27). To determine the relative methylation status (5mC) of two different DNA samples, a simple calculation of the percentage of 5mC in total DNA was made using the formula (28),(29),(30),(31):

5mC%= (sample OD-ME3 ID)/S/ (ME4 OD-ME3 ID)×2/P×100

Where,‘S’ is the amount of input DNA in ng.
‘P’ is the amount of positive input control (ME4) in ng.
Two is a factor to normalise 5mC in the positive control to 100%, as the positive control holds only 50% of 5mC.

Data for quantifying DNA methylation includes the amount of input DNA in nanograms, sample OD450, average OD450 of ME3, and average OD450 of ME4. The comparison of DNA methylation was made in both the case and control groups. Additionally, the correlation of DNA methylation with the severity of depression and mania was assessed.

Statistical Analysis

The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The data were summarised using means and Standard Deviations (SD) for continuous variables and median (range) for categorical variables. Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables. Group differences for continuous and categorical variables were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests, respectively. The correlation between DNA methylation and psychopathology scores was assessed using Pearson’s correlation. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 100 subjects were included in the present study, with 50 being bipolar disorder patients and the remaining 50 in the control group. The demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in (Table/Fig 1).

In the case group, there were 33 males and 17 females, while in the control group, there were 38 males and 12 females. The mean age of the case group was 34.44±12.46 years, whereas in the control group, it was 29.94±9.41 years, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.04). Significant differences were also observed between the groups based on marital status and family type, with the bipolar cases in the present study being older (p=0.04), more likely to be married (p<0.001), and belonging to joint families (p=0.012). Out of the 50 cases, 31 had mania (62%), with 14 cases (45.2%) each having moderate and severe episodes [YMRS score median/range: 35/(32-42)]. Additionally, 19 cases had depressive episodes (38%), with 11 cases (57.9%) classified as having very severe depression [HAM-D score median/range: 25/(17-31)]. (Table/Fig 2) presents the mean DNA methylation scores. A significant difference in global DNA methylation levels was found when comparing bipolar disorder patients and the control group (F-value=32.67; p-value <0.001). This difference was also significant among bipolar cases of different severity, with patients experiencing severe depression showing higher DNA methylation levels compared to other cases of depression (p=0.0001).

When examining the correlation between DNA methylation levels and bipolar symptoms, a significant correlation was found only with HAM-D scores (r=0.52; <0.001), while no significant correlation was observed with YMRS scores (r=0.2, p=0.12) (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The present study aimed to examine global DNA methylation levels among bipolar patients, compare them with healthy controls, and correlate them with symptomatology in bipolar disorder patients recruited from a relatively homogeneous population. The study found significantly higher methylation patterns among bipolar disorder cases, particularly among patients with BD compared to controls. There was also a significant correlation between global DNA methylation and symptom severity among BD patients. Previous studies have reported variable levels of global DNA methylation based on age and gender (32),(33),(34). In the present study, the cases were generally older than the controls (p=0.04), which may have influenced the findings. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies consider these factors and examine the effects of extraneous influences in longitudinal studies with age-matched groups to obtain conclusive results. No other sociodemographic factor was found to significantly influence the observed findings.

The present study observed greater methylation in cases of severe depression compared to those with moderate depression or mania, which is consistent with most previous studies (18),(19),(35). Some previous studies have attempted to explain these patterns, suggesting that higher methylation levels may be linked to a hypodopaminergic state and frontal lobe hypoactivity in bipolar and schizophrenia patients. Abnormal methylation levels have been associated with abnormalities in hedonic activities, cognitive processes, working memory, and social functioning among patients with depressive disorders (2),(36). These abnormal methylation levels may lead to receptor excitation or inhibition, resulting in functional changes in neurotransmission processes (37). However, it should be noted that these findings could also be influenced by the duration of illness, smoking status, substance use, and other lifestyle patterns that were not accounted for in the present study.

A significant correlation was observed between global DNA methylation and BD, but no correlation was found with mania. Higuchi and colleagues reported a similar correlation in their study, where they hypothesised that the findings may be state-dependent. This could also be true in the present study, as patients of varying severity were included in the sample (38).

Several previous studies have attempted to investigate the correlation between DNA methylation levels and symptoms of bipolar disorder, yielding mixed results. For instance, an earlier study found no differences in leukocytes between bipolar patients and controls. However, significant global hypermethylation was observed in the postmortem frontal cortex of affected individuals compared to controls (29). Conversely, two other studies reported decreased global methylation in transformed lymphoblasts and whole blood samples from BD subjects (39),(40). These discrepancies could be attributed not only to the different tissues studied but also to the varying methods used, which have been shown to differ significantly (41). Three studies assessed global methylation using Enzyme-linked Immunoassay (ELISA) (37),(40),(41), while others employed the cytokine-extension assay (21). Liu C et al., found that global methylation levels mainly exhibited increases in brain samples and decreases in peripheral tissue samples. The increased methylation probes detected in Epigenome-wide Association Study (EWAS) were enriched for neuron-related pathways, whereas peripheral tissues were mainly enriched for immune-related pathways (37).

These findings, along with the results of the present study, may provide evidence for the involvement of the immune system in psychiatric disorders. Therefore, DNA studies like these have the potential to provide important insights into the pathogenesis of severe mental illnesses such as bipolar disorder. They can be utilised for early screening, prevention, and the development of novel drugs targeting specific molecular sites. Larger studies with larger sample sizes would further contribute to understanding the diagnostic and therapeutic role of DNA alterations.

Limitation(s)

Firstly, the final sample recruited was smaller than the originally estimated number of 71 pairs of cases and controls. The sample was collected from a single tertiary centre, where cases of high severity are more likely to be seen, which may limit the generalisability of the findings. Other factors that were not accounted for, such as smoking status, past subsyndromal episodes, Body Mass Index (BMI), and age of onset, could have influenced the results mentioned above. Additionally, the present study did not identify any specific candidate genes, which may have less impact on the overall findings as the causation of most major psychiatric disorders is polygenic and still being evaluated. Furthermore, only blood samples were used in the study, and testing other tissues may yield different findings compared to other studies. It is important to note that this was a one-time cross-sectional assessment, making it difficult to determine definite causation. Recruiting asymptomatic at-risk populations or individuals presenting with prodromal symptoms may provide a better understanding of the potential use of global methylation as a biomarker for bipolar disorders.

Conclusion

Global DNA methylation levels were higher among cases of bipolar disorder, particularly among those with BD. A significant correlation was also observed between global DNA methylation and depression, which may contribute to neurochemical changes in mood disorders. Therefore, global DNA methylation could be considered a potential early marker for bipolar disorder. However, future studies should adopt a longitudinal approach and account for extraneous factors to obtain definitive answers regarding the utility of this marker.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank the Medical Research Unit, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

References

1.
Sadock VA, Ruiz P, Sadock BJ. Kaplan & Sadocks Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
2.
Fries GR, Li Q, McAlpin B, Rein T, Walss-Bass C, Soares JC, et al. The role of DNA methylation in the pathophysiology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:474-88. Doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.010. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Jirtle RL, Skinner MK. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(4):253-62. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Meyer F, Meyer TD. The misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder as a psychotic disorder: Some of its causes and their influence on therapy. J Affect Disord. 2009;112(1-3):174-83. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Ruggero CJ, Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Young D. Borderline personality disorder and the misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44(6):405-08. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.09.011. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Zimmerman M, Morgan TA. The relationship between borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013;15(2):155-69. Doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.2/mzimmerman. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Angst J, Azorin JM, Bowden CL, Perugi G, Vieta E, Gamma A, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of undiagnosed bipolar disorders in 7 of 8 patients with a major depressive episode: The BRIDGE Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(8):791-98. Doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Weiss KM. Genetic variation and human disease: Principles and evolutionary approaches. Cambridge University Press; 1993. [crossref]
9.
Chen C, Zhang C, Cheng L, Reilly JL, Bishop JR, Sweeney JA, et al. Correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression in the brains of patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Bipolar Disord. 2014;16(8):790-99. Doi: 10.1111/bdi.12255. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Kieseppä T, Partonen T, Haukka J, Kaprio J, Lönnqvist J. High concordance of bipolar I disorder in a nationwide sample of twins. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(10):1814-21. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Song J, Bergen SE, Kuja-Halkola R, Larsson H, Landén M, Lichtenstein P. Bipolar disorder and its relation to major psychiatric disorders: A family-based study in the Swedish population. Bipolar Disord. 2015;17(2):184-93. Doi: 10.1111/bdi.12242. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Li N, He X, Zhang Y, Qi X, Li H, Zhu X, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor signalling mediates antidepressant effects of lamotrigine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14(8):1091-98. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Nestler EJ, Pena CJ, Kundakovic M, Mitchell A, Akbarian S. Epigenetic basis of mental illness. Neuroscientist. 2016;22(5):447-63. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Bird AP. CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature. 1986;321(6067):209-13. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Martin EM, Fry RC. Environmental influences on the epigenome: Exposure-associated DNA methylation in human populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:309-33. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Khare T, Pal M, Petronis A. Understanding bipolar disorder: The epigenetic perspective. Curr Top BehavNeurosci. 2011;5:31-49. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Nohesara S, Ghadirivasfi M, Mostafavi S, Eskandari MR, Ahmadkhaniha H, Thiagalingam S, et al. DNA hypomethylation of MB-COMT promoter in the DNA derived from saliva in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(11):1432-38. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
D’addario C, Dell’Osso B, Palazzo MC, Benatti B, Lietti L, Cattaneo E, et al. Selective DNA methylation of BDNF promoter in bipolar disorder: Differences among patients with BDI and BDII. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(7):1647-55. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Dell’Osso B, D’Addario C, Carlotta Palazzo M, Benatti B, Camuri G, Galimberti D, et al. Epigenetic modulation of BDNF GENE: Differences in DNA methylation between unipolar and bipolar patients. J Affect Disord. 2014;166:330-33. Doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.020. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Zhang HS, Ke XY, Hu LL, Wang J, Gao LS, Xie J, et al. Study on the epigenetic methylation modification of bipolar disorder major genes. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(5):1421-25. Doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201803_14489.
21.
Bromberg A, Bersudsky Y, Levine J, Agam G. Global leukocyte DNA methylation is not altered in euthymic bipolar patients. J Affect Disord. 2009;118(1-3):234-39. Doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.031. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Cooper JE. Pocket guide to the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: With glossary and diagnostic criteria for Research. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2014.
23.
Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133(5):429-35. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23(1):56-62. Doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. PMID: 14399272; PMCID: PMC495331. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(8):597-610. Doi: 10.1038/nrg1655. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Kriaucionis S, Heintz N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science. 2009;324(5929):929-30. Doi: 10.1126/science.1169786. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Wyatt GR, Cohen SS. The bases of the nucleic acids of some bacterial and animal viruses: The occurrence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Biochem J. 1953;55(5):774-82. Doi: 10.1042/bj0550774. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324(5929):930-35. Doi: 10.1126/science.1170116. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Valinluck V, Sowers LC. Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1. Cancer Res. 2007;67(3):946-50. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Valinluck V, Tsai HH, Rogstad DK, Burdzy A, Bird A, Sowers LC. Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(14):4100-18. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Jin SG, Kadam S, Pfeifer GP. Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(11):e125. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq223. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Fuke C, Shimabukuro M, Petronis A, Sugimoto J, Oda T, Miura K, et al. Age-related changes in 5-methylcytosine content in human peripheral leukocytes and placentas: An HPLC-based study. Annals of Human Genetics. 2004;68(3):196-204. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Cole JJ, Robertson NA, Rather MI, Thomson JP, McBryan T, Sproul D, et al. Diverse interventions that extend mouse lifespan suppress shared age-associated epigenetic changes at critical gene regulatory regions. Genome Biology. 2017;18:01-06. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Kaushik A, Chaudhary V, Longkumer I, Saraswathy KN, Jain S. Sex-specific variations in global DNA methylation levels with age: A population-based exploratory study from North India. Frontiers in Genetics. 2023;14. Doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1038529 [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Rao JS, Keleshian VL, Klein S, Rapoport SI. Epigenetic modifications in frontal cortex from Alzheimer’s disease and bipolar disorder patients. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2(7):e132. Doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.55. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Abdolmaleky HM, Cheng K, Faraone SV, Wilcox M, Glatt SJ, Gao F, et al. Hypomethylation of MB-COMT promoter is a major risk factor for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(21):3132-45. Doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl253. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Liu C, Jiao C, Wang K, Yuan N. DNA methylation and psychiatric disorders. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2018;157:175-232. Doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2018.01.006.[crossref][PubMed]
38.
Higuchi F, Uchida S, Yamagata H, Otsuki K, Hobara T, Abe N, et al. State-dependent changes in the expression of DNA methyltransferases in mood disorder patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(10):1295-300. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.04.008 [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Huzayyin AA, Andreazza AC, Turecki G, Cruceanu C, Rouleau GA, Alda M, et al. Decreased global methylation in patients with bipolar disorder who respond to lithium. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17(4):561-69. Doi: 10.1017/ S1461145713001569. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Soeiro-de-Souza MG, Andreazza AC, Carvalho AF, Machado-Vieira R, Young LT, Moreno RA. Number of manic episodes is associated with elevated DNA oxidation in bipolar I disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16(7):1505-12. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Lisanti S, Omar WA, Tomaszewski B, De Prins S, Jacobs G, Koppen G, et al. Comparison of methods for quantification of global DNA methylation in human cells and tissues. PloS one. 2013;8(11):e79044.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63866.18577

Date of Submission: Mar 22, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 23, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 18, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com